Good to have a screening strategy; better to execute it consistently!

Good to have a screening strategy; better to execute it consistently!

by Rob Thomson

If a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, this article illustrates what can be the weakest link in the chain for many organizations, without even realizing it.  No matter how much time, energy, and resources are devoted to researching and implementing a comprehensive screening strategy, failure to apply it consistently renders it useless.

A screening strategy was in place as mandated by state law, and every0ne quoted in the article seemed knowledgeable about the procedure and time involved, as well as potential pitfalls and loopholes of the process.  It simply wasn’t executed.  The organization apparently lacked the oversight to put a hold on the hiring process when the candidate failed to return the background check paperwork.  They were even able to state that the hired candidate was the only one of 25 that failed to turn in the paperwork.

Interestingly, the article also mentions flaws in the state-mandated screening process, and points out that the information available had the process been followed would not have revealed negligent vehicular homicide and multiple drug charges.  Lack of complete information means this candidate may have been hired anyway even if the background check had been performed according to procedure!

All organizations should take the time to understand what a quality background check consists of and implement an efficient strategy to obtain reliable information.  The additional lesson here is that the job is not done once the strategy has been conceived.  The strategy and resources are wasted if it does not include controls to ensure consistent application.

Leave a Reply