0

Well it’s that time again to catch up on the latest background screening highlights from our blog and EmployeeScreen University.  Welcome to This Week in Background Checks (TWIB).  Let’s jump right in.

States Contemplate Early Release for Prisoners to Ease Spending- How this trend can have an impact on your background screening program.

Chester Ludow Earns His Master’s Degree- Should we be concerned that Chester is a dog?

Substandard Background Checks in Schools- Just what is a “fantastic” background check?  With the latest incident occurring in my own back yard, I couldn’t resist the opportunity to rant.

EmployeeScreenIQ Recognized as one of NE Ohio’s Fastest Growing Companies- Ouch!  Our arms are sore from patting ourselves on the back.

Podcast!!! E-Verify Mandate Finally in Place for Federal Contractors- No, the bad place down south has not frozen over and donkey’s are not flying!

Credit Scores and Background Checks- Why these things do not go together like peas and carrots.

Yale University Student Murdered- This is clearly a workplace violence issue.  Could a background check have prevented this?

For lowlights of these highlights, be sure to check out our podcast below.

As always, we’ll try to do better next time.

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

myspace_facebook_calendarTwo great blog postings from two great online legal sources.  The first by Jon Hyman of Korman, Jackson and Krantz talks about a restaurants liability of firing employees after reading their Myspace posts.  This does not fit with our argument about not using it for background screening prior to hiring but it is closely related.  If you read our story about Bozeman Montana you will see how this jury finding is important and timely.  The practice of requiring employees to divulge their passwords violated the Stored Communications Act.

The second story comes from the Legal Blog Watch.  In it, 69 year old human rights activist Khedija Arfaoui is facing an eight month jail sentence in Tunisia for posting a message on Facebook about rumors of children being kidnapped in the country for their organs.  Enjoy!

Jon Hyman Blog

Carolyn Elefant Blog

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

Not all employers conduct background checks for every position they hire. But as this recent court case shows, sometimes they’re just plain necessary.

If there’s a type of job you’d think would automatically require a background check, it’s those that involve contact with children or the elderly. In fact, background checks for those positions are required by law in some states.

Read more from HRRecruiting Alert

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

06172009_uncle-samReady. Soapbox in place, OK, here we go!

Dear Uncle Sam, when you put a mandate in place please make sure you have the capacity and bandwidth to execute it.  I am sure we can all agree that screening dockworkers is paramount to an effective homeland security policy.  However, if you can’t screen them and reach your deadlines who is going to work on the docks?  Uncle Sam, many of us have lobbied you for years that the US Government does a horrible job with background checks, maybe this is your lesson learned.  As background screeners, we understand that the unions position is contrary to the goal that every job is not for every person.  We do agree with them that this process is very much flawed and workers can’t feed their families because you (still talking to my fictional Uncle Sam) can’t do your job properly.  A proper employment screening program can be executed by a qualified employment screening company in 1-3 days.  I am sure the AFL-CIO would concur that your method is flawed, lets do it right!

Report: Security Screening Process Flawed, Leaves Dockworkers Jobless

Thousands of longshore workers, truck drivers and other workers at ports across the nation are out of work, not because of a staggering economy, but because they are caught up in a backlogged, inefficient and often inaccurate screening process for background security checks.

According to a new report from the National Employment Law Project (NELP), the federal Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA’s) post-Sept.  11 port worker background checks have put thousands of otherwise qualified and experienced port workers on the streets instead of the docks, with no rights to back pay once they gain their security clearance.

Most of the workers caught in this bureaucratic limbo are members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), Longshoremen (ILA) and Teamsters (IBT).

The report is the first evaluation of the worker protections in TSA’s Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC). It finds that thousands of workers—disproportionately African American and Latino men—have had to wait an average of seven months while their applications are reviewed, leaving them unable to work and support their families in the midst of a devastating recession.

According to the report, “A Scorecard on the Post-9/11 Port Worker Background Checks,” more than 10,000 workers had lost their jobs while awaiting TSA approval of their TWIC cards after the April 14 compliance deadline passed. Laura Moskowitz, a NELP attorney who led the study, says:

Due to serious problems with the FBI’s records, insufficient staffing and poor TSA screening protocols, there have been major processing delays for workers at ports, which means that large numbers of hard-working families are being left out in the cold at the worst possible time.

To be approved for access to the ports, applicants are subject to criminal background checks using the FBI’s database, immigration status and other security checks. However, the report notes that 50 percent of the FBI’s rap sheets are incomplete or out of date. Contrary to the federal law, TSA denies credentials in an overly broad range of cases such as open arrests, even if they have been dismissed or addressed.

When a worker is denied a security clearance and decides to appeal, Moskowitz says:

TSA and the FBI put the entire burden on the worker to collect the necessary information to clear their records and navigate the process all on their own, which then leaves thousands of workers falling through the cracks of the TWIC program.

It also finds that while worker protections in the program’s appeal process take far too long, eventually almost all workers win their credential cards on appeal. More than 24,000 workers, largely African American and Latinos, were able to keep their jobs with the help of the special protections for workers who are initially denied a credential card based on their record.

More

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

I first came across this topic earlier today reading Sam Narisi’s blog, HR Recruiting Alert.  A brilliant piece that originated from an article in last months Wall Street Journal.  Applicants are dumbing down their resumes so they don’t look OVERQUALIFIED!  In Narisi’s piece, “The New Lie Applicants Are Telling.” he states:

With jobs hard to come by, more and more applicants are lying on their resumes. But they’re not the kind of lies you’re used to.

As HR pros know, it’s not out of the question for candidates to inflate their past job titles and duties, or add academic degrees that were never completed.

But these days, many out-of-work managers are looking for stop-gap jobs and are stretching the truth in a different way — by “dumbing down” their credentials so they don’t appear overqualified.

A lot of formerly high-up employees are willing to step a few rungs down the ladder just to get a steady paycheck. Often, that requires them to convince hiring managers they won’t jump ship the moment the market improves and something better comes up.

One way their doing that: changing job titles to look less impressive, according to the Wall Street Journal. For example, one marketing exec listed her previous jobs as “manager” and “trend researcher” to “staff” and “office support.”

Candidates are also hiding degrees and other academic achievements. One woman looking for temporary clerical work said she received no calls from employers until she stopped listing her master’s degree on her resume.

More

According to the Wall Street Journal’s article:

Kristin Konopka sent out nearly 100 copies of her résumé in January in search of receptionist work, but got only one callback. That’s when Ms. Konopka, a 29-year-old New York actress and yoga teacher, took her master’s degree and academic teaching experience off her résumé.

The calls started coming in. The slimmer version of her résumé landed in 30 in-boxes and earned her three callbacks and two interviews. “It definitely picked up the interest,” says Ms. Konopka, who realized quickly that people don’t “want to hire anyone who is overqualified.”

Securing work in a tight economy means more job seekers might find themselves applying for positions below their qualifications. Many unemployed professionals are willing to take paycuts for the promise of a paycheck. But to get a foot in the door, candidates are gearing down their résumés by hiding advanced degrees, changing too-lofty titles, shortening work experience descriptions, and removing awards and accolades.

More

So, when we started EmployeeScreenIQ in 1999 one of our pitches was not to overpay candidates because they lied about their qualifications.  I guess employers need to be cautious and do background checks so not to pay market value when they are overqualified? Chew on that for a while???

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

Its one thing when a company fails to do a proper background check somewhere in the United States. Its another when it happens in my own county!  Cuyahoga County, well know around the State of Ohio for corruption has another feather for its cap.

Agency that transports the elderly within Cuyahoga County fires its finance director after The Plain Dealer inquires about his criminal past

Senior Transportation Connection — a public-private partnership that runs van service for senior citizens in about 20 Cuyahoga County communities — fired its finance director Wednesday, a day after The Plain Dealer confronted him about his recent criminal history of stealing from employers.

Jeremy D. Fields worked as a consultant for the agency since May 2007, months after getting out of prison for his second felony theft conviction in two years. Court records and interviews show that Fields, 32, embezzled nearly $200,000 from two area businesses before landing the job with Senior Transportation Connection.

Agency Director Janice Dzigiel said she was unaware of Fields’ criminal past until Tuesday when a reporter contacted Fields. Dzigiel said after Fields ended the phone call, he rushed into her office and revealed everything.

Dzigiel said she was stunned by the revelations and told Fields to turn in his keys and leave the agency offices, on West 150th Street in Cleveland.

More

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

A caller to a recent NPR radio show suggested resumes go on the endangered species list. Several guests supported the caller, claiming Google and social media outlets like YouTube and Facebook were better ways to judge qualifications.

According to one guest, the staff of a U.S. Congressman appears to agree.

A 21st century guy

Blog entry: April 22, 2009, 10:12 am     |     Author: SCOTT SUTTELL

U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, an up-and-coming Democrat from Niles, is a pretty modern guy. An anecdote about him on NPR’s “Talk of the Nation” show Tuesday reinforces the point.

The show built off a Washington Post feature about spring cleaning that asked 10 writers to name institutions or people we’d be better off without.

A “Talk of the Nation” caller suggested the country would be a better place without resumes, which are so polished and formulaic that they tell employers nothing of value about an applicant.

One of the show’s guests, Ana Marie Cox, national correspondent for Air America, agreed and noted that at a recent event Rep. Ryan mentioned that he no longer accepts resumes from people who want to work in his office. Instead, according to Ms. Cox, the congressman requires job applicants to take a writing test and to submit a YouTube video about themselves.

Pretty great idea. For the record, Rep. Ryan on his web site posts some biographical information but no formal resume, and the home page features 35 YouTube videos on various topics.

 

Click the link below for the audio piece. The comments are around the 24 minute mark.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103327792

 

Now, it is important to note that our staff has not corroborated the hiring practices claimed in the article or the NPR piece. So this isn’t a commentary about a Congressional office’s hiring practice. But it’s an interesting concept.

Are resumes “”positioned” to make a candidate look good? Of course. And while I appreciate the novelty of the idea and embrace using technology to complement a hiring strategy, I obviously disagree. After all, how do you know if what the applicant says on YouTube or their Facebook and LinkedIn profile is accurate?

We find discrepancies on resumes about 55% of the time. Not all result in a client pulling a job offer. But many of them do. How many discrepancies would be found by watching a video online? Depending on where he or she worked, how many of you would be comfortable with that person in that position?

Next week in Las Vegas, employeescreenIQ will be at the SHRM Staffing Management Conference speaking about the dangers of using social networking sites as a pre-employment screening tool. If you will be there, we’d love you to stop by and add your .02.

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

Welcome back to This Week in Background Checks (TWIB) where we highlight some of the top stories posted on employeescreen University and the IQBlog.  Here’s a quick recap:

From the IQBlog

From employeescreen University

And Finally, Some Shameless Plugs

That’s all she wrote!  Remember, for all you brave souls that you can listen to the podcast version of this installment of TWIB notes below.

As always, we’ll try to do better next time!

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

What would the Noid do? We make it a policy while blogging to never directly call out a company for not conducting proper background checks.  However, this story is on every news outlet, newspaper, blog, video service and twitter on the internet.  I have seen and heard this story at least 25 times in the past 24 hours.  Our friends a Cheezhead did a great job explaining it!

After a shocking video that showed Domino’s employees putting food up their nose and passing gas on salami surfaced on YouTube to an audience of millions, the pizza chain went into a damage control frenzy.

The perpetrators were captured and slapped with felonies. Their criminal history has been revealed much to the disgust of the American public, many of whom wonder how one of the accused, who had a rap sheet including sexual battery and possession of stolen property, was eligible to be hired for a job dealing with the public in the first place.

An exhausted and embarrassed Patrick Doyle, Domino’s president, appeared in his own video today in which he assured the public that everything has now been handled appropriately. The statement borders on begging. Check it out for yourself.

If they do revamp their hiring policies, would you give them a second chance?

More

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

0

We found this one on the California Employment Attorney Blog early this morning.  The case does not define if the employer conducted a proper background check, it does however say they knew about the convictions.  The good news for the employer is they were found not liable.  The bad news for their management is they should look at their hiring practices and re-evaluate what types of crimes eliminate applicants from employment.

In Phillips v. TLC Plumbing, Inc., a California Court of Appeal addressed the issue of negligent hiring and retention. One of TLC’s employees had been convicted for domestic violence and arson involving his former wife. TLC learned this about the employee when it hired him. The employee struck up a relationship with a customer while on a service call to her house. TLC terminated the employee a month later for misuse of a company vehicle, drug and alcohol use, and threatening a coworker. The terminated employee and the woman, however, became romantically involved and continued their relationship after the employee’s termination. Approximately two years after his termination from TLC, the former employee shot and killed the woman. The woman’s family then sued TLC for negligent hiring and retention.

TLC argued that it did not owe any duty of care to the plaintiff, because the murder had occurred two years after TLC terminated the employee. The California Appellate Court agreed, finding that “[B]ecause the employer-employee relationship ends on termination of an employee’s employment, we conclude an employer does not owe a plaintiff a duty of care in a negligent hiring and retention action for an injury or harm inflicted by a former employee on the plaintiff even though that former employee, as in this case, initially met the plaintiff while employed by the employer.”

More

  • Print
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • Scoopeo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Share This Post

Continue Reading

All information contained on this website is provided by employeescreenIQ solely for the convenience of the site viewers. employeescreenIQ is not providing legal advice or counsel and nothing provided on this website or otherwise by employeescreenIQ should be deemed as legal guidance or advice. Users are solely responsible for complying with all local, state, and federal laws relating to the use of any information provided on this website and any information products provided by employeescreenIQ. Users should consult with their own legal counsel if they have questions regarding their legal responsibilities or any information provided by employeescreenIQ.